Bone Marrow Concentrate Enriched in Platelet Growth Factors Combined With De-mineralized Bone Matrix for Complex Revision and Complex Lower Limb Arthrodesis


Authored by Edgardo R Rodriguez

Complex arthrodesis procedures in the lower limb present a challenging model for successful outcomes, especially in the face of multiple co-morbidities [1]. Not only is this patient population at risk for delayed union and nonunion, the potential for infection and delay in soft tissue healing is also of great concern [2]. Autolo-gous fusion solutions have been used for decades in bone repair procedures in the form of bone grafts (iliac or rib) or bone marrow (Figure 2) aspirate harvested from the marrow cavities with good results. Bone graft harvest comes with inherent challenges, often resulting in do-nor site morbidity [3]. Bone marrow aspirate (BMA) har-vested from the marrow cavities is a mixture of stromal and peripheral blood and has less inherent risk and still provides a potent osteogenic stimulus. Unfortunately, pure BMA has relatively few osteoprogenitor cells per volume and contains a high proportion of red blood cells that can interfere with bone healing [4].


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Image
Hip Replacement Surgery: "Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution" Authored by M E Hecht Suppose you’ve just been told you need hip surgery, have a cardiac condition, or you’ve developed diabetes. At this moment you are most likely to be in a doctor’s office, in point of fact the diagnosing doctor’s office, possibly in some state of undress, or having just come from an x-ray, or EKG. There’s no doubt about it, as an experience, it’s up front and personal, not matter how succinct and professional the announcement- up front, personal, and threatening as hell. I mean the doctor may have run several miles this morning, had a carb loaded breakfast, or not a scrap of pain in any of his major or minor joints, he’s in good shape. But you’ve just been told your body has betrayed you. What’s more, if you’re a card player you could say at this point, that you’re the doctor holds cards, spades, and big Casino. In short, it can be a moment of inequality second to none. How...
Read more

Juniper Publishers-Physeal Injuries are Special

Image
Juniper Publishers-Open Access Journal of Orthopedics & Rheumatology Physeal Injuries are Special Authored by Waleed Kishta Secondary ossification centers for the epiphysis and apophysis evolve through different stages until complete fusion. This evolution leads to variations in fracture patterns and based on mechanism and anatomical location. This is important as roughly 15% of all children fractures involve a physeal injury [1]. In this review, we will briefly touch on the mechanism, pathophysiology, diagnosis, investigations and management of physeal injuries related to secondary ossification. Three stages of secondary ossification, including: pre-ossification, pre-fusion, and incomplete fusion selected. Apophyseal injuries represent a special subset as their injury can fall into several categories based on stage of development. To Read More Full Text Click on: https://juniperpublishers.com/oroaj/OROAJ.MS.ID.555563.php For more articles in Open A...
Read more

Juniper Publishers - Fractures of the Proximal Third Tibia Treated With Intramedullary Interlocking Nails and Blocking Screws

Image
  Orthopedics and Rheumatology Open Access Journal Abstract Background: Internal splint age of proximal metaphyseal tibial fractures has gained acceptance as a method of early stabilization of such injuries. Intramedullary nailing is a challenging procedure .This study tries to evaluate treatment outcomes of closed reduction and intramedullary nailing with the aid of blocking screws to maintain the reduction and stabilize theses injuries. Patients and Method: Thirty patients (23 males and 7 females) with proximal metaphyseal tibial fractures were treated and followed from June 2010 and February 2014 (44 months) with average 19 months. Age ranged between 23 to 55 years (average, 38 years). According to A.O. Classification 13 cases were Type A 2.1, 9 cases were Type A 2.1 (II), and 8 cases were Type A 3.2. Seven cases were open fractures and according to Gustilo Anderson classification 4 cases were Grade (I), 3cases were Grade (II). All cases were treated by in...
Read more